Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy - Bhedābheda Vedānta

A place where Harsi contributes links and information gathered from a variety of sources for the inspiration and evolution of all.
Post Reply
User avatar
harsi
Posts: 2284
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Nuremberg, Germany
Contact:

Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy - Bhedābheda Vedānta

Post by harsi »

The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy: http://www.iep.utm.edu

Bhedābheda Vedānta
By Andrew J. Nicholson
N.Y. Stony Brook Univ.

Bhedābheda Vedānta is one of the several traditions of Vedānta philosophy in India. “Bhedābheda” is a Sanskrit word meaning “Difference and Non-Difference.” The characteristic position of all the different Bhedābheda Vedānta schools is that the individual self (jīvātman) is both different and not different from the ultimate reality known as Brahman. Bhedābheda reconciles the positions of two other major schools of Vedānta.

The Advaita (Monist) Vedānta that claims the individual self is completely identical to Brahman, and the Dvaita (Dualist) Vedānta that teaches complete difference between the individual self and Brahman. However, each thinker within the Bhedābheda Vedānta tradition has his own particular understanding of the precise meanings of the philosophical terms “difference” and “non-difference.” Bhedābheda Vedāntic ideas can be traced to some of the very oldest Vedāntic texts, including quite possibly Bādarāyaṇa’s Brahma Sūtra (app. 4th c. CE).

Bhedābheda ideas also had an enormous influence on the devotional (bhakti) schools of India’s medieval period. Among medieval Bhedābheda thinkers are Vallabha (1479-1531 CE), founder of the Puṣṭimārga devotional sect now centered in Nathdwara, Rajasthan, and Caitanya (1485-1533 CE) the founder of the Gaudīya Vaiṣṇava sect based in the northeastern Indian state of West Bengal.

Table of Contents (Clicking on the links below will take you to those parts of this article)

1. Historical Overview
a. Bādarāyaṇa and Bhartṛprapañca
b. Bhāskara
c. Yādavaprakāśa and Nimbārka
d. Vallabha
e.Caitanya
f. Vijñānabhikṣu

2. Ontology
One of the most notable differences between Bhedābheda Vedānta and Advaita (Monistic) Vedānta is their views on the existence of the phenomenal world. While Advaita holds that the phenomenal world is ultimately unreal (mithyā) and that only Brahman truly exists, Bhedābheda thinkers insist that the phenomenal world is real, and not at all illusory.

In this basic assertion they are in line with the majority of Indian philosophical schools, including the schools of Qualified Non-Dualist (Viśiṣṭādvaita) Vedānta, Dualist (Dvaita) Vedānta, Nyāya, Sāṅkhya, and Mīmāṃsā. Although Advaitins cite certain passages from the Upaniṣads as supporting the notion that the world is akin to a mirage or a magical trick, Bhedābhedavādins accuse Advaitins of borrowing this idea from the Mind-only (Cittamātra) school of Buddhism, and frequently employ the epithet of “crypto-Buddhist” (pracchannabauddha) to refer to Advaitins.

a. Part and Whole
b. Aupādhika and Svābhāvika Bhedābheda

3. Causality
a. Pariṇāmavāda (Theory of real transformation)
b. Vivartavāda (Theory of unreal manifestation)
c. Satkāryavāda (Theory of pre-existent effect)

4. Theology and soteriology
a. God in Bhedābhedavāda
In the medieval period, Bhedābheda Vedānta became closely associated with theism in general, and the movement of bhakti devotionalism in particular. There is a reason that bhaktas such as Vallabha (1479-1531 CE) and Caitanya (1485-1533) built the foundations of their theological systems on centuries-old Bhedābheda concepts. Like the schools of Rāmānuja and Madhva, Bhedābhedavāda is a realist school. Whereas in the Advaita school even God has to be understood as ultimately unreal, since He too is merely Brahman limited by the artificial condition of lordliness, certain types of Bhedābheda philosophy can accommodate a God who is real in his qualified (saguṇa) form.

Although on a certain level, an Advaitin can profess a belief in God, he or she knows that ultimately God is merely a crutch, a heuristic to enable human beings to go one step closer to that ultimate Brahman devoid of qualities (nirguṇa). Such a God is ultimately unsatisfying for those whose primary interest is devotion—in any system of Advaita, devotion must occupy a lower position than pure knowledge. On the other hand, many worshippers will also be unsatisfied with the Dvaita school’s uncompromising notion that they themselves are completely separate from God, and that ultimate unification with the Godhead is impossible. Both Bhedābhedavāda and Viśiṣṭādvaita offer the possibility to bridge these two alternatives, by offering the alternative of both a real God possessing qualities and the possibility of personal participation in that Godhead.

b. Knowledge combined with ritual acts leads to liberation
5. References and Further Reading (more)
Bhedābheda Vedānta Web Search »

• Articles on Indian Philosophy Currently Published on the IEP • Articles on: KarmaReligion. Moral

BuddhaMadhyamaka Buddhism
Huineng (638-713 CE) "Zen"
Lieh-tzu or Master Lie / Xuanzang
Pudgalavada Buddhist Philosophy
NagarjunaNirvanaSeng-Chao

Epistemology -The study of knowledge (more)
Post Reply